Constitutional Court effectively cancels measure to reform asylum reception

Belgium's Constitutional Court has effectively cancelled one of the legal provisions through which federal minister for Asylum and Migration Anneleen Van Bossuyt sought to reform the reception of asylum seekers. The Court had suspended the measure in February. It is argued that the abolition of the option of reception in the form of financial assistance is contrary to EU law and certain fundamental rights.

At the end of February, the Constitutional Court suspended two measures introduced by Van Bossuyt of N-VA that reformed the reception of asylum seekers.

Under the first measure, asylum agency Fedasil could refuse material assistance to anyone applying for asylum in Belgium if they had already been granted asylum in another EU member state. The second measure abolished the possibility that, in exceptional circumstances, reception could take the form of financial assistance.

Constitutional Court suspends stricter asylum rules

The Constitutional Court of Belgium has temporarily suspended parts of the federal government’s stricter asylum and migration legislation...

belganewsagency.eu

It is this latter measure that the Constitutional Court has now annulled. Regarding the first measure, the court is still awaiting a response from the Court of Justice of the EU.

Following the suspension, Van Bossuyt – despite widespread criticism – immediately indicated that she would press ahead with her reception freeze for asylum seekers who had already been granted protection elsewhere in the EU. According to her, Belgian legislation contained “additional grounds” for maintaining that reception freeze.

After the Council of State suspended an instruction to Fedasil on the matter at the end of March, Van Bossuyt announced new working arrangements with the asylum agency. From now on, refusals would have to be made on a case-by-case basis and be sufficiently justified, she said.

European Court of Human Rights rules against Belgium over inadequate reception of asylum seekers

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled against Belgium for the inadequate reception of four asylum seekers. The court found that, as...

belganewsagency.eu

Opposition party Groen reacted positively to the new ruling. MP Matti Vandemaele did point out, however, that the financial aid was granted only in exceptional cases. “It was therefore largely a symbolic measure, not really a decision that would make a significant difference," he said. "The measure was primarily intended to contribute to the ‘tough image of the strictest migration policy ever’. This annulment is yet another embarrassment for the minister. We expect minister Van Bossuyt to return to working within the bounds of the rule of law.”

^{Fedasil arrival centre in Brussels © BELGA PHOTO HATIM KAGHAT}